« Patient for Proofs | Main | The Fine Print »
Comments
Verify your Comment
Previewing your Comment
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
So whatcha think?
Posted by: Kevin | 02/29/2004 at 08:53 PM
Definetely Saucy Dance Lessons. Love the vibrant colours and the look of passion; where can I get such dance lessons? :)
Posted by: monika | 02/29/2004 at 10:13 PM
I'll second the dance lessons. If you're gonna go with the romance novel theme, you'll have to add a scantily-clad female and Fabio on the cover.
Posted by: James Craig | 03/01/2004 at 10:59 AM
Saucy dance lessons is the hit - who knew? I still love them both.
Posted by: Florrie | 03/01/2004 at 02:04 PM
It depends - are you going for pretentious/trendy or aiming straight for kitsch?
Posted by: mina | 03/01/2004 at 04:30 PM
Mina's not coming.
Posted by: Kevin | 03/01/2004 at 06:48 PM
No surprise there... psuedointellectual "creatives" who live in overpriced McLofts are generally not receptive to criticism.
Posted by: mina | 03/01/2004 at 06:57 PM
Kevin pal, my vote's for the dance lesson.
How can I get an invite to your party?
Just kidding.
BTW, I drove past lightroom on saturday, very nice building, very nice indeed.
Posted by: Jose Mora | 03/02/2004 at 05:58 PM
The vibrant colors of the "dance lessons" are great, but I think the vintage elegance and simplicity of the "romance novel" are absolutely fantastic.
By the way, what is that typeface used for "This isn't another ordinary party"?
Posted by: Jacob | 03/05/2004 at 04:31 AM
Dance lesson looks like something that will stand out. That's my vote (not that it matters ;) )
Posted by: John Athayde | 03/15/2004 at 01:47 PM
dance lessons - i'd buy it.
Posted by: the real janelle | 03/18/2004 at 08:49 PM